ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ
ÇEVİRİ
Aim & Scope
The Journal of Tafsir Studies (TADER) is an open access journal that provides publication of articles in all areas of Tafsir an Quran. It is an international refereed e-journal. TADER have the aim to propagate innovative scientific research and eminence in knowledge. TADER has become a prominent contributor for the researchers and societies. TADER is making the bridge between research and scientific developments.
TADER is a scholarly academic journal published twice a year on 30 April and 30 October.
Academic articles produced in the following areas are published in our magazine.
TAFSIR, TAFSIR HISTORY, QUR’AN RESEARCHES, HISTORY OF THE QUR’AN, QIRA’AT, BALĀḠAT
Writing Rules
WRITING PRINCIPLES
Articles should be written in Microsoft Word program and page margins should be adjusted as follows:
-Paper Size: Vertical A4
-Top Margin: 3 cm
-Lower Margin: 3 cm
Left Margin: 2.5 cm
-Right Margin: 2.5 cm
- Font: Garamond
-Font Style: Normal
-Size (regular text): 12 point
-Size (footnote text): 10 point
-Normal Text Line Spacing: 1,5 / Paragraph Spacing: 0 pt First, 6 pt After
-The main text (Excluding Bibliography, Abstract and Footnotes) paragraph indent should be 1, 25 in the first line.
- The paragraph indent of the footnotes should be 0.5 hanging, all references should be aligned by pressing the tap button on the first line, justified, line spacing should be single.
-Self and Abstract Spelling Rule: Font should be Garamond, Normal, 11 Punto, Line spacing: Single.
-Arabic characters should be Times New Roman with 12 characters.
-The verses or texts in Arabic as separate paragraphs should be centered on the right, justified, without paragraph indent.
It should be written in a single paragraph. The first of the keywords should be the relevant discipline.
-Block quotations should be in a separate paragraph with Garamond font and 1.25 cm indent from the left and 11 font size. Paragraph space should not be left.
The articles should contain a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 7 keywords with an abstract of 150-350 words.
In studies such as book, symposium, workshop evaluation, there should be 200-350 words Turkish and English abstract.
- Headings in the article should be automatically titled in accordance with Isnad Citation System 2 and the titles should be aligned.
Only the first letter of all titles should be capitalized.
- Care should be taken that there is no line space between the paragraphs in the article.
-The references should start on a separate page after the results page. Line spacing: 1.5. Paragraph indent: The hanging should be justified at 1.25. There should be no line spacing between references in the text of the article.
-Turkish in the text should be selected and spelling mistakes that may be caused by Spelling Grammar scanning should be cleared as much as possible.
-TADER uses the Isnad Citation Style 2 (The Isnad Citation Style 2) in citation and bibliography writing.
- Footnotes and bibliography should be arranged according to the changes made in the Referral Citation System 2.
The Isnad Citation Style: http://www.isnadsistemi.org
Articles that do not meet the ISNAD ATIF SYSTEM 2. EDITION criteria will not be accepted.
ALL STUDIES SUBMITTED TO THE JOURNAL SHOULD BE ORGANIZED ACCORDING TO THE SAMPLE ARTICLE FILE, INCLUDING THE COVER. In particular, the author should fill in the relevant places in the file, taking into account his own identity and article information.
For the sample article file, see. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/904/file-manager/21304/download
Ethical Principles and Publication Policy
Publication processes applied in the Journal of Tafsir Researches are the basis for the development and distribution of information in a neutral and respected way. The processes implemented in this direction are directly reflected in the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions supporting the authors. Referees are studies that embody and support the scientific method. At this point, it is important that all stakeholders of the process (writers, readers and researchers, publishers, referees and editors) comply with the standards for ethical principles. Within the scope of TADER ethics, all stakeholders are expected to have the following ethical responsibilities.
The ethical duties and responsibilities below have been prepared as open access, taking into account the guidelines and policies published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (see COPE Directive in Turkish).
Also see. Theology Field Journals Editors Workshop Decisions (20/01/2018)
Publishing an article in a refereed journal is an essential building block in the development of a harmonious and respected information network. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and their supporting institutes. Refereed articles support and shape scientific methods. Therefore, reaching an agreement in the standards of expected ethical behavior is important for all publishing parties, author, journal editor, referee and publisher organizations:
1. Authorship
The bibliography list should be complete.
Plagiarism and fake data should not be included.
The same research should not be attempted to be published in more than one journal, and should comply with science research and publication ethics.
Actions contrary to science research and publication ethics are:
a) Plagiarism: Presenting others' ideas, methods, data, applications, writings, shapes or works as part of their own works, without reference to scientific rules,
b) Fraud: To produce data that is not based on research, to edit or change the submitted or published work based on unrealistic data, to report or publish them, to show an undone research as done,
c) Distortion: To falsify research records and obtained data, to show the methods, devices and materials that are not used in the research as used, to evaluate the data that are not compatible with the research hypothesis, to play with data and / or results, to adapt to the relevant theories or assumptions, distorting or shaping the research results in line with their interests,
ç) Re-publication: To present more than one work containing the same results of a research as separate works in the professorship exam evaluations and academic promotions,
d) Slicing: Presenting the results of a research as separate works in associate professorship exam evaluations and academic promotions, disrupting the integrity of the research, disassembling it inappropriately and making numerous publications without citing each other,
e) Unfair authorship: Including people who do not have an active contribution among authors, not including people who have an active contribution among authors, changing the author's order unjustly and inappropriately, removing the names of those who have an active contribution from the work during publication or in subsequent editions, to include his name among the authors,
f) Other types of ethical violations: It is tasked to not expressly state the contributions of individuals, institutions or organizations and their support in the publications of the research carried out with support, not to respect the ethical rules in the researches conducted on human and animals, to respect the rights of the patients in their publications, to examine them as referees. to share the information in the work with others before publication, to use the resources, places, facilities and devices provided or reserved for scientific research for purposes, to charge a completely groundless, unwarranted and deliberate violation of ethics (YÖK Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive, Article 8).
2. Author's Responsibilities
All authors should contribute significantly to the research.
It is necessary to declare that all the data in the article is real and original.
All authors must ensure retraction and correction of errors.
3. Responsibilities of Arbitrators
Assessments should be impartial.
Referees should not be in conflict of interest with research, authors and / or research funders.
Referees should indicate the relevant published but not cited works.
Checked articles should be kept confidential.
4. Editorial Responsibilities
Editors have full responsibility and authority to accept or reject an article.
Editors should not be in a conflict of interest regarding articles they accept or reject.
Only articles that will contribute to the field should be accepted.
It should support the publication or retraction of the correction when errors are found.
Price Policy
Ücret alınmamaktadır.
